By Sara Finegan
Students on the autism spectrum don’t tend to make inferences deliberately. It’s not that they never make them; they just aren’t aware of it and it needs to be brought to their attention before we can teach them to transfer the skill from their own lives to the written word. It’s important to treat inferencing instruction as a process, not a project. By this I mean that we should be patient, slow, and consistent in implementing some sort of practice of making inferences into our instruction all year long.
There is no Language Arts unit called “Making Inferences.” There is a gradual unveiling of the skill and ongoing work in strengthening it as a reading habit. Reading comprehension strategies should not be taught in isolation, or in compact curricular plans. Reading comprehension is a set of practices which layer, one upon the other, to create an overlay for any book we read.
First Steps
I never begin my instruction in making inferences by teaching it. I begin with stories. During our early morning housekeeping, I may tell a quick anecdote about something that happened and see what conclusions the kids can draw from it. Essentially, my stories are about a person or an event which is described but not named.
I may talk about how my daughter called me in a panic asking for the name of a good car repair shop, and see if the kids would infer that she either had an accident or that her car had broken down. I might describe the man whose office I visited, and his spotless white coat and that stethoscope he wore around his neck, and see if the kids would infer that I was at the doctor. 
Or, I might talk about how my cats had suddenly started scratching themselves like crazy, and see if they would suggest that they have fleas. Invariably, someone in the class will raise his or her hand and make a suggestion that involves an inference about the story I’m telling. And when they do, I say “excellent inference!” and proceed to restate the event, the setting, or the person I’m talking about. It takes less than five minutes to accomplish this task, and the kids soon learn to be paying attention to my words in order to “guess” what’s going on. Very casual, very informal.
Awareness of their inferences
The informality does not belie the purpose, which is to familiarize the kids with the concept of making inferences and an awareness when they make them. When we are supporting readers with autism in developing comprehension strategies, it’s important, though not crucial that they be able to identify the strategy and when they are doing it. (Why is it important? I believe that the children I teach need to develop an awareness of the way they think and learn. This prepares them for reflection on their progress and goals, and allows them to participate more fully in their own instruction.) The first step in teaching kids to make inferences as they read is to tell them what an inference is, and show them that they already use it to some extent in their lives.
About a month into any given school year, I add a quick routine to my morning instruction. On a series of index cards, I write word groups that are intended to provoke an inference. I will show the kids two or three of the cards in the morning, and perhaps two or three in the afternoon, right after lunch and before we start social studies. I simply place a card on the document camera and wait for the kids, individually or in groups, to shout out what they think the words have in common. As with my anecdotes, the word groupings always have to do with an event or a character or a setting. I keep it simple, and try to incorporate the kids’ own background knowledge as I write the word cards.
Tip: I have, on occasion, begun with picture cards instead of words. For a few days, I’ll show kids cards as described above, only the cards will have 3-4 pictures instead of words. Then I’ll move to word cards.
During this time, some fabulous and thoughtful discussions usually begin about the words and their connotations. I push kids to justify their choices and explain them to the rest of the class. If there’s a disagreement, we talk about it. My role is as facilitator, and thus I do not intervene with the right or wrong answer, but simply ask open-ended questions to help guide the kids to a deeper discussion.
Teacher: Ok, who will read the words? Sammy?
Sam: Cake, flowers, white dress, church
Teacher: Terrific. Who has an inference?
Jaylin: Birthday party.
Sam: No way. It’s a wedding.
Jaylin: But there’s cake.
Brianna: I put quinceanera.
Teacher: Three ideas! Let’s discuss! Jaylin, talk about your inference that it’s a birthday party. Tell me the words you used for that inference.
Jaylin: Cake, ‘cause there’s cake at a birthday party. And flowers. And a nice dress.
Teacher: Oh, so you understood that people dress up for a birthday party, sure.
Jaylin: Yeah. And there’s presents.
Teacher: Oh, you used the word “presents”? Is that on the list?
Jaylin: No.
Teacher: Brianna, talk about your idea that it’s a quinceanera.
Brianna: Girls wear white dresses and you can have communion at church, and they decorate with flowers.
Teacher: Oh, so you used the word church and the white dresses and the flowers to come up with that. Have you been to a quinceneara?
Brianna: My sister had one.
Sam: But you don’t go to church. It’s just a party.
Teacher: That is true in many Mexican communities, Sammy. But other cultures, like the Puerto Rican culture, often have a religious service before the party.
Sam: Oh.
Teacher: Sam, talk about why you think it’s a wedding.
Sam: Because the girl wears a white dress and it’s in a church. You don’t have a birthday party in a church.
Jaylin: Oh, yeah.
Teacher: Ok, so Jaylin, are you adjusting your ideas now?
Jaylin: Yeah. He’s right, they don’t do birthday parties in the church. I forgot that word.
Teacher: Well, what about Brianna’s inference?
Brianna: My sister had hers and we all went to church first.
Teacher: So no wonder you thought “quinceneara” when you saw those words! Well, maybe we need more information to determine which inference is more reasonable. What word could we add, Sam, to make it clear that it’s a wedding?
Sam: Wedding.
Teacher: Well, without saying that. How about, say, “bride” or “ring”?
Sam: Yeah, that’s good.
Teacher: Brianna, what word could we add to show that it’s a quinceanera?
Brianna: I don’t know.
Teacher: Anyone have an idea?
Stuart: What if we say “Mexican”?
Teacher: Do only Mexicans celebrate quinceneara?
Brianna: No.
Teacher: Hmmmm. Ok. Well, is there a number or a word we could use?
Brianna: 15?
Teacher: Ohhhh. 15. Why?
Brianna: Because that’s how old you are when you have it.
Teacher: Oh, ok. So if we add 15, does that make people think it’s a quinceneara?
Students: Yes.
Teacher: And since the 15 is not on the card, what can we reasonably infer?
Brianna: I think it’s a wedding.
(Page 1 of 2)
Continued: Be sure to click on the next page below!
Related posts:
- The problem of the read-aloud
- Autism and hyperlexia, part 1: Anaphoric cuing?
- Fiction with a purpose (but one at a time)
- Say what? Asking questions as one reads
- Out, out, damned plot! Keeping track of “Who…did what?”
2 Comments
From Jeanne
Comment #1: Sounds as though the kids are motivated to participate in the detective work. But I was puzzled as to how the need for defining the objectives of the word search is conveyed. How do they get from a passage with no words underlined to “setting,character,and event?”
Comment #2: How do you convince kids to abandon inferences that don’t hold up with additional info? I was reading with a boy about the first moon landing. When we got to the point where the book said that a landing module was going to separate from the space capsule, the kid said “One man will go to the moon and the other two will stay in the space capsule.” Knowing that that wasn’t gomg to be how it was, I said “Let’s read further in the book and see – I think maybe two men landed on the moon and one stayed in the space capsule.” The boy maintained his own “inference,” and we never read further in the story because he evidently didn’t want to explore. Crucally, I wanted to convey the idea that information can be found in books, but didn’t wanted to imply that books are never wrong.
Jeanne
Your inference lesson is very interesting. Sounds like these are pretty high-functioning students. What ages? Would you do this with 8-10 year olds that aren’t quite as verbal?
Ann